Documentation / networking / nf_flowtable.rst


Based on kernel version 5.13. Page generated on 2021-06-28 07:05 EST.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

====================================
Netfilter's flowtable infrastructure
====================================

This documentation describes the Netfilter flowtable infrastructure which allows
you to define a fastpath through the flowtable datapath. This infrastructure
also provides hardware offload support. The flowtable supports for the layer 3
IPv4 and IPv6 and the layer 4 TCP and UDP protocols.

Overview
--------

Once the first packet of the flow successfully goes through the IP forwarding
path, from the second packet on, you might decide to offload the flow to the
flowtable through your ruleset. The flowtable infrastructure provides a rule
action that allows you to specify when to add a flow to the flowtable.

A packet that finds a matching entry in the flowtable (ie. flowtable hit) is
transmitted to the output netdevice via neigh_xmit(), hence, packets bypass the
classic IP forwarding path (the visible effect is that you do not see these
packets from any of the Netfilter hooks coming after ingress). In case that
there is no matching entry in the flowtable (ie. flowtable miss), the packet
follows the classic IP forwarding path.

The flowtable uses a resizable hashtable. Lookups are based on the following
n-tuple selectors: layer 2 protocol encapsulation (VLAN and PPPoE), layer 3
source and destination, layer 4 source and destination ports and the input
interface (useful in case there are several conntrack zones in place).

The 'flow add' action allows you to populate the flowtable, the user selectively
specifies what flows are placed into the flowtable. Hence, packets follow the
classic IP forwarding path unless the user explicitly instruct flows to use this
new alternative forwarding path via policy.

The flowtable datapath is represented in Fig.1, which describes the classic IP
forwarding path including the Netfilter hooks and the flowtable fastpath bypass.

::

					 userspace process
					  ^              |
					  |              |
				     _____|____     ____\/___
				    /          \   /         \
				    |   input   |  |  output  |
				    \__________/   \_________/
					 ^               |
					 |               |
      _________      __________      ---------     _____\/_____
     /         \    /          \     |Routing |   /            \
  -->  ingress  ---> prerouting ---> |decision|   | postrouting |--> neigh_xmit
     \_________/    \__________/     ----------   \____________/          ^
       |      ^                          |               ^                |
   flowtable  |                     ____\/___            |                |
       |      |                    /         \           |                |
    __\/___   |                    | forward |------------                |
    |-----|   |                    \_________/                            |
    |-----|   |                 'flow offload' rule                       |
    |-----|   |                   adds entry to                           |
    |_____|   |                     flowtable                             |
       |      |                                                           |
      / \     |                                                           |
     /hit\_no_|                                                           |
     \ ? /                                                                |
      \ /                                                                 |
       |__yes_________________fastpath bypass ____________________________|

	       Fig.1 Netfilter hooks and flowtable interactions

The flowtable entry also stores the NAT configuration, so all packets are
mangled according to the NAT policy that is specified from the classic IP
forwarding path. The TTL is decremented before calling neigh_xmit(). Fragmented
traffic is passed up to follow the classic IP forwarding path given that the
transport header is missing, in this case, flowtable lookups are not possible.
TCP RST and FIN packets are also passed up to the classic IP forwarding path to
release the flow gracefully. Packets that exceed the MTU are also passed up to
the classic forwarding path to report packet-too-big ICMP errors to the sender.

Example configuration
---------------------

Enabling the flowtable bypass is relatively easy, you only need to create a
flowtable and add one rule to your forward chain::

	table inet x {
		flowtable f {
			hook ingress priority 0; devices = { eth0, eth1 };
		}
		chain y {
			type filter hook forward priority 0; policy accept;
			ip protocol tcp flow add @f
			counter packets 0 bytes 0
		}
	}

This example adds the flowtable 'f' to the ingress hook of the eth0 and eth1
netdevices. You can create as many flowtables as you want in case you need to
perform resource partitioning. The flowtable priority defines the order in which
hooks are run in the pipeline, this is convenient in case you already have a
nftables ingress chain (make sure the flowtable priority is smaller than the
nftables ingress chain hence the flowtable runs before in the pipeline).

The 'flow offload' action from the forward chain 'y' adds an entry to the
flowtable for the TCP syn-ack packet coming in the reply direction. Once the
flow is offloaded, you will observe that the counter rule in the example above
does not get updated for the packets that are being forwarded through the
forwarding bypass.

You can identify offloaded flows through the [OFFLOAD] tag when listing your
connection tracking table.

::

	# conntrack -L
	tcp      6 src=10.141.10.2 dst=192.168.10.2 sport=52728 dport=5201 src=192.168.10.2 dst=192.168.10.1 sport=5201 dport=52728 [OFFLOAD] mark=0 use=2


Layer 2 encapsulation
---------------------

Since Linux kernel 5.13, the flowtable infrastructure discovers the real
netdevice behind VLAN and PPPoE netdevices. The flowtable software datapath
parses the VLAN and PPPoE layer 2 headers to extract the ethertype and the
VLAN ID / PPPoE session ID which are used for the flowtable lookups. The
flowtable datapath also deals with layer 2 decapsulation.

You do not need to add the PPPoE and the VLAN devices to your flowtable,
instead the real device is sufficient for the flowtable to track your flows.

Bridge and IP forwarding
------------------------

Since Linux kernel 5.13, you can add bridge ports to the flowtable. The
flowtable infrastructure discovers the topology behind the bridge device. This
allows the flowtable to define a fastpath bypass between the bridge ports
(represented as eth1 and eth2 in the example figure below) and the gateway
device (represented as eth0) in your switch/router.

::

                      fastpath bypass
               .-------------------------.
              /                           \
              |           IP forwarding   |
              |          /             \ \/
              |       br0               eth0 ..... eth0
              .       / \                          *host B*
               -> eth1  eth2
                   .           *switch/router*
                   .
                   .
                 eth0
               *host A*

The flowtable infrastructure also supports for bridge VLAN filtering actions
such as PVID and untagged. You can also stack a classic VLAN device on top of
your bridge port.

If you would like that your flowtable defines a fastpath between your bridge
ports and your IP forwarding path, you have to add your bridge ports (as
represented by the real netdevice) to your flowtable definition.

Counters
--------

The flowtable can synchronize packet and byte counters with the existing
connection tracking entry by specifying the counter statement in your flowtable
definition, e.g.

::

	table inet x {
		flowtable f {
			hook ingress priority 0; devices = { eth0, eth1 };
			counter
		}
	}

Counter support is available since Linux kernel 5.7.

Hardware offload
----------------

If your network device provides hardware offload support, you can turn it on by
means of the 'offload' flag in your flowtable definition, e.g.

::

	table inet x {
		flowtable f {
			hook ingress priority 0; devices = { eth0, eth1 };
			flags offload;
		}
	}

There is a workqueue that adds the flows to the hardware. Note that a few
packets might still run over the flowtable software path until the workqueue has
a chance to offload the flow to the network device.

You can identify hardware offloaded flows through the [HW_OFFLOAD] tag when
listing your connection tracking table. Please, note that the [OFFLOAD] tag
refers to the software offload mode, so there is a distinction between [OFFLOAD]
which refers to the software flowtable fastpath and [HW_OFFLOAD] which refers
to the hardware offload datapath being used by the flow.

The flowtable hardware offload infrastructure also supports for the DSA
(Distributed Switch Architecture).

Limitations
-----------

The flowtable behaves like a cache. The flowtable entries might get stale if
either the destination MAC address or the egress netdevice that is used for
transmission changes.

This might be a problem if:

- You run the flowtable in software mode and you combine bridge and IP
  forwarding in your setup.
- Hardware offload is enabled.

More reading
------------

This documentation is based on the LWN.net articles [1]_\ [2]_. Rafal Milecki
also made a very complete and comprehensive summary called "A state of network
acceleration" that describes how things were before this infrastructure was
mainlined [3]_ and it also makes a rough summary of this work [4]_.

.. [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/738214/
.. [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/742164/
.. [3] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2018-January/010830.html
.. [4] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2018-January/010829.html