Documentation / networking / msg_zerocopy.rst


Based on kernel version 5.14. Page generated on 2021-08-31 10:40 EST.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256

============
MSG_ZEROCOPY
============

Intro
=====

The MSG_ZEROCOPY flag enables copy avoidance for socket send calls.
The feature is currently implemented for TCP and UDP sockets.


Opportunity and Caveats
-----------------------

Copying large buffers between user process and kernel can be
expensive. Linux supports various interfaces that eschew copying,
such as sendpage and splice. The MSG_ZEROCOPY flag extends the
underlying copy avoidance mechanism to common socket send calls.

Copy avoidance is not a free lunch. As implemented, with page pinning,
it replaces per byte copy cost with page accounting and completion
notification overhead. As a result, MSG_ZEROCOPY is generally only
effective at writes over around 10 KB.

Page pinning also changes system call semantics. It temporarily shares
the buffer between process and network stack. Unlike with copying, the
process cannot immediately overwrite the buffer after system call
return without possibly modifying the data in flight. Kernel integrity
is not affected, but a buggy program can possibly corrupt its own data
stream.

The kernel returns a notification when it is safe to modify data.
Converting an existing application to MSG_ZEROCOPY is not always as
trivial as just passing the flag, then.


More Info
---------

Much of this document was derived from a longer paper presented at
netdev 2.1. For more in-depth information see that paper and talk,
the excellent reporting over at LWN.net or read the original code.

  paper, slides, video
    https://netdevconf.org/2.1/session.html?debruijn

  LWN article
    https://lwn.net/Articles/726917/

  patchset
    [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] socket sendmsg MSG_ZEROCOPY
    https://lkml.kernel.org/netdev/20170803202945.70750-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com


Interface
=========

Passing the MSG_ZEROCOPY flag is the most obvious step to enable copy
avoidance, but not the only one.

Socket Setup
------------

The kernel is permissive when applications pass undefined flags to the
send system call. By default it simply ignores these. To avoid enabling
copy avoidance mode for legacy processes that accidentally already pass
this flag, a process must first signal intent by setting a socket option:

::

	if (setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ZEROCOPY, &one, sizeof(one)))
		error(1, errno, "setsockopt zerocopy");

Transmission
------------

The change to send (or sendto, sendmsg, sendmmsg) itself is trivial.
Pass the new flag.

::

	ret = send(fd, buf, sizeof(buf), MSG_ZEROCOPY);

A zerocopy failure will return -1 with errno ENOBUFS. This happens if
the socket option was not set, the socket exceeds its optmem limit or
the user exceeds its ulimit on locked pages.


Mixing copy avoidance and copying
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Many workloads have a mixture of large and small buffers. Because copy
avoidance is more expensive than copying for small packets, the
feature is implemented as a flag. It is safe to mix calls with the flag
with those without.


Notifications
-------------

The kernel has to notify the process when it is safe to reuse a
previously passed buffer. It queues completion notifications on the
socket error queue, akin to the transmit timestamping interface.

The notification itself is a simple scalar value. Each socket
maintains an internal unsigned 32-bit counter. Each send call with
MSG_ZEROCOPY that successfully sends data increments the counter. The
counter is not incremented on failure or if called with length zero.
The counter counts system call invocations, not bytes. It wraps after
UINT_MAX calls.


Notification Reception
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The below snippet demonstrates the API. In the simplest case, each
send syscall is followed by a poll and recvmsg on the error queue.

Reading from the error queue is always a non-blocking operation. The
poll call is there to block until an error is outstanding. It will set
POLLERR in its output flags. That flag does not have to be set in the
events field. Errors are signaled unconditionally.

::

	pfd.fd = fd;
	pfd.events = 0;
	if (poll(&pfd, 1, -1) != 1 || pfd.revents & POLLERR == 0)
		error(1, errno, "poll");

	ret = recvmsg(fd, &msg, MSG_ERRQUEUE);
	if (ret == -1)
		error(1, errno, "recvmsg");

	read_notification(msg);

The example is for demonstration purpose only. In practice, it is more
efficient to not wait for notifications, but read without blocking
every couple of send calls.

Notifications can be processed out of order with other operations on
the socket. A socket that has an error queued would normally block
other operations until the error is read. Zerocopy notifications have
a zero error code, however, to not block send and recv calls.


Notification Batching
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Multiple outstanding packets can be read at once using the recvmmsg
call. This is often not needed. In each message the kernel returns not
a single value, but a range. It coalesces consecutive notifications
while one is outstanding for reception on the error queue.

When a new notification is about to be queued, it checks whether the
new value extends the range of the notification at the tail of the
queue. If so, it drops the new notification packet and instead increases
the range upper value of the outstanding notification.

For protocols that acknowledge data in-order, like TCP, each
notification can be squashed into the previous one, so that no more
than one notification is outstanding at any one point.

Ordered delivery is the common case, but not guaranteed. Notifications
may arrive out of order on retransmission and socket teardown.


Notification Parsing
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The below snippet demonstrates how to parse the control message: the
read_notification() call in the previous snippet. A notification
is encoded in the standard error format, sock_extended_err.

The level and type fields in the control data are protocol family
specific, IP_RECVERR or IPV6_RECVERR.

Error origin is the new type SO_EE_ORIGIN_ZEROCOPY. ee_errno is zero,
as explained before, to avoid blocking read and write system calls on
the socket.

The 32-bit notification range is encoded as [ee_info, ee_data]. This
range is inclusive. Other fields in the struct must be treated as
undefined, bar for ee_code, as discussed below.

::

	struct sock_extended_err *serr;
	struct cmsghdr *cm;

	cm = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(msg);
	if (cm->cmsg_level != SOL_IP &&
	    cm->cmsg_type != IP_RECVERR)
		error(1, 0, "cmsg");

	serr = (void *) CMSG_DATA(cm);
	if (serr->ee_errno != 0 ||
	    serr->ee_origin != SO_EE_ORIGIN_ZEROCOPY)
		error(1, 0, "serr");

	printf("completed: %u..%u\n", serr->ee_info, serr->ee_data);


Deferred copies
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Passing flag MSG_ZEROCOPY is a hint to the kernel to apply copy
avoidance, and a contract that the kernel will queue a completion
notification. It is not a guarantee that the copy is elided.

Copy avoidance is not always feasible. Devices that do not support
scatter-gather I/O cannot send packets made up of kernel generated
protocol headers plus zerocopy user data. A packet may need to be
converted to a private copy of data deep in the stack, say to compute
a checksum.

In all these cases, the kernel returns a completion notification when
it releases its hold on the shared pages. That notification may arrive
before the (copied) data is fully transmitted. A zerocopy completion
notification is not a transmit completion notification, therefore.

Deferred copies can be more expensive than a copy immediately in the
system call, if the data is no longer warm in the cache. The process
also incurs notification processing cost for no benefit. For this
reason, the kernel signals if data was completed with a copy, by
setting flag SO_EE_CODE_ZEROCOPY_COPIED in field ee_code on return.
A process may use this signal to stop passing flag MSG_ZEROCOPY on
subsequent requests on the same socket.


Implementation
==============

Loopback
--------

Data sent to local sockets can be queued indefinitely if the receive
process does not read its socket. Unbound notification latency is not
acceptable. For this reason all packets generated with MSG_ZEROCOPY
that are looped to a local socket will incur a deferred copy. This
includes looping onto packet sockets (e.g., tcpdump) and tun devices.


Testing
=======

More realistic example code can be found in the kernel source under
tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c.

Be cognizant of the loopback constraint. The test can be run between
a pair of hosts. But if run between a local pair of processes, for
instance when run with msg_zerocopy.sh between a veth pair across
namespaces, the test will not show any improvement. For testing, the
loopback restriction can be temporarily relaxed by making
skb_orphan_frags_rx identical to skb_orphan_frags.