Documentation / arch / x86 / cpuinfo.rst


Based on kernel version 6.11. Page generated on 2024-09-24 08:21 EST.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

=================
x86 Feature Flags
=================

Introduction
============

The list of feature flags in /proc/cpuinfo is not complete and
represents an ill-fated attempt from long time ago to put feature flags
in an easy to find place for userspace.

However, the amount of feature flags is growing by the CPU generation,
leading to unparseable and unwieldy /proc/cpuinfo.

What is more, those feature flags do not even need to be in that file
because userspace doesn't care about them - glibc et al already use
CPUID to find out what the target machine supports and what not.

And even if it doesn't show a particular feature flag - although the CPU
still does have support for the respective hardware functionality and
said CPU supports CPUID faulting - userspace can simply probe for the
feature and figure out if it is supported or not, regardless of whether
it is being advertised somewhere.

Furthermore, those flag strings become an ABI the moment they appear
there and maintaining them forever when nothing even uses them is a lot
of wasted effort.

So, the current use of /proc/cpuinfo is to show features which the
kernel has *enabled* and *supports*. As in: the CPUID feature flag is
there, there's an additional setup which the kernel has done while
booting and the functionality is ready to use. A perfect example for
that is "user_shstk" where additional code enablement is present in the
kernel to support shadow stack for user programs.

So, if users want to know if a feature is available on a given system,
they try to find the flag in /proc/cpuinfo. If a given flag is present,
it means that

* the kernel knows about the feature enough to have an X86_FEATURE bit

* the kernel supports it and is currently making it available either to
  userspace or some other part of the kernel

* if the flag represents a hardware feature the hardware supports it.

The absence of a flag in /proc/cpuinfo by itself means almost nothing to
an end user.

On the one hand, a feature like "vaes" might be fully available to user
applications on a kernel that has not defined X86_FEATURE_VAES and thus
there is no "vaes" in /proc/cpuinfo.

On the other hand, a new kernel running on non-VAES hardware would also
have no "vaes" in /proc/cpuinfo.  There's no way for an application or
user to tell the difference.

The end result is that the flags field in /proc/cpuinfo is marginally
useful for kernel debugging, but not really for anything else.
Applications should instead use things like the glibc facilities for
querying CPU support.  Users should rely on tools like
tools/arch/x86/kcpuid and cpuid(1).

Regarding implementation, flags appearing in /proc/cpuinfo have an
X86_FEATURE definition in arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h. These flags
represent hardware features as well as software features.

If the kernel cares about a feature or KVM want to expose the feature to
a KVM guest, it should only then expose it to the guest when the guest
needs to parse /proc/cpuinfo. Which, as mentioned above, is highly
unlikely. KVM can synthesize the CPUID bit and the KVM guest can simply
query CPUID and figure out what the hypervisor supports and what not. As
already stated, /proc/cpuinfo is not a dumping ground for useless
feature flags.


How are feature flags created?
==============================

a: Feature flags can be derived from the contents of CPUID leaves.
------------------------------------------------------------------
These feature definitions are organized mirroring the layout of CPUID
leaves and grouped in words with offsets as mapped in enum cpuid_leafs
in cpufeatures.h (see arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h for details).
If a feature is defined with a X86_FEATURE_<name> definition in
cpufeatures.h, and if it is detected at run time, the flags will be
displayed accordingly in /proc/cpuinfo. For example, the flag "avx2"
comes from X86_FEATURE_AVX2 in cpufeatures.h.

b: Flags can be from scattered CPUID-based features.
----------------------------------------------------
Hardware features enumerated in sparsely populated CPUID leaves get
software-defined values. Still, CPUID needs to be queried to determine
if a given feature is present. This is done in init_scattered_cpuid_features().
For instance, X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC is defined as 11*32 + 0 and its presence is
checked at runtime in the respective CPUID leaf [EAX=f, ECX=0] bit EDX[1].

The intent of scattering CPUID leaves is to not bloat struct
cpuinfo_x86.x86_capability[] unnecessarily. For instance, the CPUID leaf
[EAX=7, ECX=0] has 30 features and is dense, but the CPUID leaf [EAX=7, EAX=1]
has only one feature and would waste 31 bits of space in the x86_capability[]
array. Since there is a struct cpuinfo_x86 for each possible CPU, the wasted
memory is not trivial.

c: Flags can be created synthetically under certain conditions for hardware features.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of conditions include whether certain features are present in
MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS or specific CPU models are identified. If the needed
conditions are met, the features are enabled by the set_cpu_cap or
setup_force_cpu_cap macros. For example, if bit 5 is set in MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS,
the feature X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT will be enabled and
"split_lock_detect" will be displayed. The flag "ring3mwait" will be
displayed only when running on INTEL_XEON_PHI_[KNL|KNM] processors.

d: Flags can represent purely software features.
------------------------------------------------
These flags do not represent hardware features. Instead, they represent a
software feature implemented in the kernel. For example, Kernel Page Table
Isolation is purely software feature and its feature flag X86_FEATURE_PTI is
also defined in cpufeatures.h.

Naming of Flags
===============

The script arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mkcapflags.sh processes the
#define X86_FEATURE_<name> from cpufeatures.h and generates the
x86_cap/bug_flags[] arrays in kernel/cpu/capflags.c. The names in the
resulting x86_cap/bug_flags[] are used to populate /proc/cpuinfo. The naming
of flags in the x86_cap/bug_flags[] are as follows:

a: The name of the flag is from the string in X86_FEATURE_<name> by default.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
By default, the flag <name> in /proc/cpuinfo is extracted from the respective
X86_FEATURE_<name> in cpufeatures.h. For example, the flag "avx2" is from
X86_FEATURE_AVX2.

b: The naming can be overridden.
--------------------------------
If the comment on the line for the #define X86_FEATURE_* starts with a
double-quote character (""), the string inside the double-quote characters
will be the name of the flags. For example, the flag "sse4_1" comes from
the comment "sse4_1" following the X86_FEATURE_XMM4_1 definition.

There are situations in which overriding the displayed name of the flag is
needed. For instance, /proc/cpuinfo is a userspace interface and must remain
constant. If, for some reason, the naming of X86_FEATURE_<name> changes, one
shall override the new naming with the name already used in /proc/cpuinfo.

c: The naming override can be "", which means it will not appear in /proc/cpuinfo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The feature shall be omitted from /proc/cpuinfo if it does not make sense for
the feature to be exposed to userspace. For example, X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS is
defined in cpufeatures.h but that flag is an internal kernel feature used
in the alternative runtime patching functionality. So, its name is overridden
with "". Its flag will not appear in /proc/cpuinfo.

Flags are missing when one or more of these happen
==================================================

a: The hardware does not enumerate support for it.
--------------------------------------------------
For example, when a new kernel is running on old hardware or the feature is
not enabled by boot firmware. Even if the hardware is new, there might be a
problem enabling the feature at run time, the flag will not be displayed.

b: The kernel does not know about the flag.
-------------------------------------------
For example, when an old kernel is running on new hardware.

c: The kernel disabled support for it at compile-time.
------------------------------------------------------
For example, if 5-level-paging is not enabled when building (i.e.,
CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL is not selected) the flag "la57" will not show up [#f1]_.
Even though the feature will still be detected via CPUID, the kernel disables
it by clearing via setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_LA57).

d: The feature is disabled at boot-time.
----------------------------------------
A feature can be disabled either using a command-line parameter or because
it failed to be enabled. The command-line parameter clearcpuid= can be used
to disable features using the feature number as defined in
/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h. For instance, User Mode Instruction
Protection can be disabled using clearcpuid=514. The number 514 is calculated
from #define X86_FEATURE_UMIP (16*32 + 2).

In addition, there exists a variety of custom command-line parameters that
disable specific features. The list of parameters includes, but is not limited
to, nofsgsbase, nosgx, noxsave, etc. 5-level paging can also be disabled using
"no5lvl".

e: The feature was known to be non-functional.
----------------------------------------------
The feature was known to be non-functional because a dependency was
missing at runtime. For example, AVX flags will not show up if XSAVE feature
is disabled since they depend on XSAVE feature. Another example would be broken
CPUs and them missing microcode patches. Due to that, the kernel decides not to
enable a feature.

.. [#f1] 5-level paging uses linear address of 57 bits.